假如我有一天我当上了中华人民共和国主席，中共中央党委书记。天下将是这样的：

 

   首先，百年大计教育为先，俗话说：“十年树木，百年树人”教育部部长---慫悦，要实现中西方教育的全面接轨，英语是重中之重，学好英语要从娃娃抓起。从小就要体会 I have a dream 才能发音好，语法好，词汇量大，熟练地运用地道的英语才是关键。使得中国人的英语，中文双语皆通，两语都要抓，两语还要硬。

   第二，农业也是一个大国崛起的关键，一个国家的综合国力的提高要依赖羽农业的支持。离开了农业，一切都是空想。而农业的关键又在于种子。农业部部长---憨晨，种子的好坏关键在于种子从哪来。优良的品种得从大兴来出口，大兴的还有次品，得从我家来进口。保证是不种不知道，一种吓一跳。

   第三，再未来的二百年里，坚持和谐社会还会是我党工作的中心，二百年不改变。和谐社会不光是人与社会，人与人的和谐，还有人与自然界的全面和谐。期中囊括了人与动物， 人与植物的和谐。而在接下来的五十年里，我们工作的中心还是要保持在人与动物的和谐上。中国科学院动物研究所所长---猴鹏，长期以来一直坚守在人与动物界和谐的领域上，至今已经成功研制了人和猴的相互转化基因，实现了猴类历史上的飞跃，第一次由一只猴类打入人类群体之中，至今此猴已在人类中存活了20年之久。

   第四，人权是当今时代的主题，我党紧跟时代的要求在今后强调男女平等，同工同酬等一系列的政策来保护女性同胞的应有的权利。在这的重要的问题上全国妇联当任了重要的职责，中华全国妇女联合会主任---小色，从任职任职以来一直兢兢业业奋战在自己的岗位上，认真执行教育、引导广大妇女，增强自尊、自信、自立、自强的精神，全面提高素质，促进妇女人才成长的宏伟目标，为我党的全面建设添砖加瓦，值得广大人民学习。

   第五，再建我国新时期的外交大国的任务再接下来的四十年里尤为重要，我们将采用全新的外交攻势，再一次确立中国的世界外交大国，政治大国，经济大国的地位。在新一任中华人民共和国外交部部长---小帅哥的领导下，我国的美男外交政策正逐渐被世界各国所广为赞同，并相继被美国，英国，法国，德国等多哥国家所采用。在世界各地产生了一股选美男把外交的世界风暴，并成功多次使得各国重要女性领导人拜倒在小帅哥的石榴裤下，为我国在未来一百年里的外交政策打下了坚实的基础。

   第六，全面提高全民素质，提高我国的综合国立，把我国建设为民主，富强，团结，和谐的社会主义国家。呆子，痴子，傻子一直以来是我们所面临的头等难题。于2008年1月31日刚刚成立的“中国痴傻呆研究所”的成立解决了这一难题。出任所长的呆呆是一个关于痴呆方面颇有研究的学者，（自称IQ竟高达120，远远高出常人）在他的带领下已有一位身患痴呆治病的患者已经康复，考入大学并在雅思考试中拿到了6的高分。此项技术的发明是全世界的痴呆傻人民的福音，而且我相信在呆所长的带领下，痴呆傻研究所一定会百尺竿头跟进一步。

   最后，孙子兵法有云：“知彼知己，方能百战百胜。” 任何一个帝国都是建立在强大的谍报网之下的。苏联称霸之时曾今拥有世界上最大的谍报机构，有全世界无孔不入的间谍网。所以想要在未来的两百年里称霸世界，情报问题也值得我们关注。一支训练有素的谍报捣蛋小组的成立为我国的新型谍报网注入了新的活力。中华人民共和国国家安全局谍报捣蛋小组组长---丧帅，人如其名，其丧无比，普天之下无人能及。此小组的主要任务是打入敌人情报网内部并摧毁敌方情报机构，例如：使对方笔记本电脑不翼而飞，对方情报员忘了接头人，机密文件神秘失踪等等，可以说是把他的才能发挥到了极致。

 

  以上就是中国在未来几百年内的宏伟蓝图，望各级行政，事业单位，部门好好贯彻落实中央的决策，办大事，办好事，办实事。为建设民权，民生，民主的社会主义添砖加瓦。

 

 

 

谢谢主席，各位观众，大家晚上好！众所周知----生命短暂，人生匆匆；人活一世，贵在安康。可是， 仅仅06年一年，全国就发生交通事故38万起，死亡人数高达89455人，那么也就是说，平均每五分钟，就有一人死于车祸。一件件流血的事实，一例例惨痛的教训，无时无刻不在提醒我们：车若猛虎，人要让行呀！因此，我方观点是：道路上，行人应当让机动车。

 

原因有三：

 

其一：道路上,谁是弱者？无需回答。看看那一幕幕惨剧，答案一目了然。与强大的机动车相比，行人自然是道路上的弱者。我国《民法》规定，汽车属于高速交通工具，本身就具有高度危险性。一个对生命负责的行人，应当避免与机动车的正面交锋。在机动车面前，“让”---何尝不为上上之测。难道对方辩友，忍心把你们，口口生生说的弱势力量的命运，交给他人吗？为何不自力更生，把命运掌握在行人自己的手里呢？要知道，生命是经不起这样的玩笑的！

 

其二，随着机动车与日俱增，车多路少的现象日益突显，而对路权的争夺直接导致了交通堵塞。有句话说的好：“朝九晚五”车必堵。如果又如对方所说，机动车让行人，那无疑是给了原本就紧张的交通一记狠狠的耳光，行人也着实在司机的伤口上无情地洒了把盐，唉，一碰钱就痛，一想心就碎呀！

 

其三，从交通运输效率来说，行人让机动车，动作简单，但可以大大提高交通效率，减少堵车现象，行成一个良性循环。只要行人都现出一点爱，道路将变成美好的人间啊！

 

最后，我想用《弟子箴言》中的一句话，来与对方辩友共勉：谦虚谨慎，自矜其智，非智也; 谦让之智,斯为大智；自矜其勇, 非勇也，谦让之勇，斯为大勇。

马上就要赶赴三亚的凤凰国际机场，在机场的附近随便找了一家水果滩。让司机把车停在了水果滩的旁边，而我就进去挑选一些海南的特产让兄得们也尝尝鲜。在水果滩的旁边我看见一个六十来岁的老太太看见她正在卖槟榔，我正好也想卖一点槟榔带回家，毕竟这也是海南的特产，所以我就向那个老太太卖了十个槟榔。

 

老太太很客气，立马就把自己的椅子让给我坐了，自己就蹲下来给我准备槟榔，我很尴尬地坐下了，毕竟当时我对自己说却之不恭嘛！我坐下后看见老太太的孙女也出来帮忙了，一个小巧玲珑的女孩子，皮肤发黑，个儿也不高，看上去就像是上一个天真的小学生，默默不语在帮自己的奶奶干活。后来我就和老太太聊天，才知道她有十三个儿女，这是一个让人目瞪口呆的数字，这就意味这她曾经忍受过十三次生小孩的痛苦，是一个饱经沧桑的人。聊得渐渐熟了，老太太开始向我夸耀她的孙女，说道：“不容易啊，今年刚刚上高中，是三亚一中的！”  导游用略带调侃的语气说到：阿婆啊，他是北京来的大学生，大学生啊！”  顿时仿佛有什么东西突然从闹钟闪过一样，感觉到自己是那么的幸福，是个大学生，要是我在北京说我是个大学生，一定不会有什么大惊小怪的，而在海南确是完全的不同。仿佛被阿婆和小妹的那种羡慕的眼神看得有些不太自然。槟榔已经好了，正在我要离开之际，说时迟那时快，从老太太的背后突然冲出一个一米高左右的小男孩，用海南话对着老太太说：“这是我爸买的梨，给你吃！”在常人眼里可能这么和自己的奶奶说话是不太礼貌的，但是又有谁会在乎呢，你可知道我要走的时候三亚可是下着雨小男孩冒着雨给奶奶送来了新疆香梨。送完东西，那小家伙就径直跑了回去。老太太知道我听不懂还那话，就把刚才那个小男孩说的给我翻译了一遍，可以看出老太太心中有的只是骄傲和满足，虽然可能只是几个梨而已，加在一起可能就十几块钱啊。

 

在我付了钱就要走的时候，老太太一把拉住我，从刚才孙子送来的梨里拿出两个递给我，说到：“小伙子，拿着带回北京或者在飞机上吃啊，这是我孙子给我的。”当时我毫不犹豫就接过阿婆的梨，因为我知道那不光是两个梨，那还是阿婆对我的希望，希望我回北京之后好好地念书。那是两个不大的新疆香梨，却是沉甸甸的在我手中撰着，因为有确信那不只是两个简简单单的香梨，还是凝聚这小辈们对自己长辈尊敬之情的梨，是体现着海南人好客的梨。那是两个梨！是爱与希望夹杂的心，也是那海南阿婆勤劳的体现。那水汪汪的梨看上去就不是那果树上种出来的一般的梨，而是子女用爱来浇灌的补品，而现在它们还是被阿婆加上自己的纯真祝福后的圣果，最后阿婆慷慨的送给了我。这肯定是世界上最甜的香梨，因为在那梨的深处我能看见爱的祈祷和心灵的祝福，和长在尘世间用化肥来浇灌的梨完全的不同。因为它给人们的是心灵上的甜——心灵的慰藉。用嘴尝出甜的梨只是一个好梨，而用心品出来是甜的梨才是一个真正梨。

 

在海南我看见了，在梨里有那个英姿飒爽的阿婆和含情脉脉的小姑娘，还有那来自大海的祝福：一路顺风！谢谢你，海上的阿婆，谢谢你，海上的小姑娘。我会在遥远的北方为你们祈祷：好人一生平安！

 

我也向上帝祈祷：让这个世界充满爱！

五天紧凑的行程之后昨晚飞回了北京，在飞机上海南旅行中的一幕幕美景再一次掠过大脑之中。海南风情那可以说真是五味俱全啊！

 

和大陆相比，海南是一个比较封建但有比较开放的小岛。之所以说它封建，是应为女人在海南是不热衷于读书的，导游告诉我，在海南一个小姑娘只要是上完了初中就算是比较博学多才或者说是一个在大陆遍地都是的高中生在海南那都是高才生啊！正是因为它们不是特别地重视教育，才会导致海南人的生活水平普遍不高的情形，穷人的孩子还是穷人，穷人的子孙还是穷人，这就是在文革时期被人们引以为傲的 “我家三代是贫农”。那里都是一些科技含量不是很高的热带种植产业，种一些椰子，槟榔什么的。很多的海南男人就靠这些东西来挣钱的，而女人大多数都是会挣一些外快什么的，回家后又会为自己的丈夫做饭洗碗洗衣服，男人只要在家里等椰子掉下来就行了，没事的时候就打牌喝茶，家里的经济再拮据也要让自己的男人口袋里装个二百块，这就是海南的民风，这让我想起了古代的女子，崇尚三从四德，但女子有在外面抛头露面，她们也是养家糊口的主力军。在宾馆的时候看见很多开黑出租的人，大多数的都是女人，还有街边的卖海南特长的小商贩大多也是女子，她们都是整晚的在宾馆附近，要睡觉就在车上小憩一下。在当今社会中有很多的人特别是男人把养家糊口为己任，最引以为傲的就是自己的工作养活了一家人，整天在办公室里，整日就是公文包和文件却忽略了大自然给我们的美景，他们忘了在中国的南边还有一个美丽寂静的小岛有着天堂一般的景色。

 

悠闲，清逸，这里才是天堂,这里的人才真正的生活在天堂之中，尽管他们不会用电脑，不懂什么是msn，他们不会来看我的博客，他们根本就不知道 那些个所谓的什么高科技产品，他们就满足于自己手中一个月的四五百块钱来过活，他们根本不在乎什么是不是开这凯迪拉克上班，他们不在乎是否冬天有暖气，夏天有空调。这才是天堂，forever tropical paradise! 是啊，在海南的时候你只要被它的风景所吸引就行了，不要有其他什么的顾虑，那里淳朴的民风就像清风一般，也是一道美丽的风景线。到了那里，你就仿佛置身于世外桃源一般，这才是海南的精髓，这才是海南的精神，不光是大海的辽阔和天空的蔚蓝，还有那种人们所向往的悠闲的生活方式。

 

正是这海南的独特风情， 岛内是男人的天堂，更给那些在尘世中迷失方向的人找到了心灵的避风港！！

今年是58年国庆，我选择了和超哥还有光子去世界上最大的广场----天安门广场。那里真的是人山人海 "people mountain people sea". 

 

下午我去了图书大厦，在那里我看见了一个聋哑的女孩，那她递给我一张卡片，意思是：我是聋哑协会的，我们这些聋哑人自己做了一些个装饰品，5元一个，向让我帮她买一个。那个东西很好看，它当时就给我一种感觉，那就是它会给我带来幸运。恰恰正好，当我买了后，那个女孩就把她的那张卡片翻过来，后面写了四个大字: 祝你好运！

 

我很庆幸我当时在毫无思维的的情况下做的决定是正确的。后来我又看见那女孩的身影在图书大厦的人群中穿过，每次我碰见她我能给她的只是一给渺小的微笑，在一个有着对生命执著追求，对未来积极乐观的女生下我的微笑是那么的渺小，好像是地球和篮球一样，而我却是那个篮球。她对生命的态度，她的言语，她的行动是对上天不公和薄情的最好抗议。和那些在大街上乞讨的健全人相比，她很美丽。我陶醉了，在书的世界里，我却是被一本活生生的书所吸引，她太美丽了，都让我分不出是花儿还是她根美丽。但是直到此时此刻，我才恍然大悟，那些花儿只是习惯性的在每年的春季美丽一两下，而她却是一颗美常美树，是用自己的生命来展现自己的美丽给世界的。那种才是真正的美。不是女生脸蛋的美丽，更不是女生身材的火辣，而是一种从自己灵魂深处散发出来的芬芳，不是那些个名牌香水所能营造出的香气。那是一种身体自然飘出的香，只要她们的灵魂还在，那么他们就肯定是世界上最美丽的人，时间都不能阻止他们的beauty.

 

我祝福你们!!! 你们才是上帝真正的宠儿，它给了你们我们这些凡夫俗子永远望尘莫及的东西-----精神，美的精神。而你也大方的把它传递给世人。我会好好保存它的，就像曾经有人问我：你最喜欢什么？ 我的答案是我最想要的也是我最喜欢的东西是天使的眼睛。让我可以帮助那些有需要帮助的人，让我可以分辨出世间的真善美，让我看清世界的假恶丑，那才是一双慧眼，而我仿佛在那个小饰品里看到了，一双天使的眼睛。

Silly But Brilliant Man to Be Leader Easily

 

A leader is a person who guides or directs a group, team or an organization. Probably he or she looks distinguished or outstanding form others because of their appearance. The majority of people insist that leaders must pretend to make them different from the normal. Is it reality? However, they have the highest statues, they have the best benefits, they have the most powerful leading rights which can make them determine the direction of the future. Whereas, no one could share the several commercial secrets or power with them, they feel lonely. Obviously, we need a unique leader in a particular area. Ancient Chinese sayings say, “The higher position you are, the more criticism you will get.” It’s tough and hard to be an informed leader. Here you have many good characteristics a good leader must be equipped

A silly man in America ----George W. Bush, who is the son of a former silly president George H.W. Bush, now is the president of America. The first when George W. Bush was fighting for his presidency on TV in 2002, I was impressed by his “cartoon face”, ignored his curved gray hair, which looked like a vivid chimpanzee. His extremely rough face was decorated with groups of lines. His massive nose was likely to fall down if he was not careful. Nevertheless, the small mouth was just under his giant nose. That was why I was deeply impressed, when first time I saw him. It was a sun-balanced phenomenon that clearly displayed his comedic face. I was amazed by his acceptable fact that he had won the vote competition. The reason he beat out the other candidate was that this country needed an “animal president” who cared himself or herself more than what he or she cared about his or her citizens. So Bush Junior did. It indicated that, I’m sure, Americans like animals.

A cartoon appearance is also a useful resource for someone’s career. In midst of dialogue with a lady, a cartoon appearance could make them closer and closer. A lovable middle-aged man with smiling is more attractive to the all ladies. It’s OK for you to be a good “cartoon face” will make you a good and talented leader. The leader must be cordial, kind to their subordinates, because you have to direct and teach them how to do it and what to do. In terms of that, you must communicate instantly with your own subordinates heart to heart. A cartoon face you born with, is a good deal. Suppose there are two clients, one is a cartoon face, the other is severe. Which one you are prefer? If I were you, obviously I would choose a cartoon face client even I am male. I like cartoons either. At least it is pleased to talk with a “cartoon character”.

It is true to say that everybody should dream to have a cooperative junior with a lovely face and easily to know. I suggest you to be the Detective Conan , a famous character in cartoon, who is a genius high school detective in Japan. What a clear brain he has! You will be popularly acceptable by adolescents. Even if you are foolish enough to be contented, don’t show it, but grumble with rest; and if you could do with a little, ask for a great deal, because if you don’t, you will get any. Remember you have millions of cartoon fans to support you.

In addition, though cartoon face is significant, the common factors are as well. In building their list of the 20^th century’s top business leader, you will divide these brilliant bosses into three types: the entrepreneur, the manager and the charismatic. No matter what their styles, they all possess a cute sensitivity to social, political, technological contexts.

It doesn’t matter if you are a brilliant leadership but no a cartoon face. George W. Bush won the voting game not only just by his chimpanzee face, also with his graduation from Yale University, his family background and his own effort. Graduated from Yale, he got a certificate proofed he was bracketed not so much with contemporaries. Born surround by many politicians in his family, he griped the way for him to roar his fame and to gain his reputation. If he was born in any average family, he couldn’t find any financial group to provide him grant for vote. If he was a fool, he couldn’t be the president. If he hadn’t had a cartoon face, there are not many Bush fans to follow him. Maybe in the lists of US presidents, there was not George W. Bush longer.

You are silly but brilliant; let yourself to be the leader please!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                         Gay?

 

 

 

Gays and lesbians in America would do themselves a great service by exposing the nature of surveys that claim to assess our number in the population to a severe critique.

Karin Swann

Familiar to most gays and lesbians in America is the Kinsey Report's statistic revealing that a full 10% of the American population had experienced some form of personal exposure to "homosexuality." This statistic was determined by a survey conducted in the late 1940s which — fifty years later — is certainly worthy of re-evaluation. How was homosexuality assessed in Kinsey's research, and how might today's population be best assessed? Or, perhaps more importantly, would a contemporary survey reveal these numbers to have changed?

 

The recent attention brought to gays and lesbians by the Clinton administration's position on gays in the military has brought a wave of related reports on the American public. The consequence of coverage on homosexuality is a familiar debate among gays and lesbians who deliberate over the potential value of exposure, regardless of content. Recently, however, a story ran on CNN's Headline News (Friday, February 26th) offering more recent statistics on gays in America which, I would argue, has an indisputably negative impact. In this report, a "general social survey" administered by Tom Smith at the National Opinion Research Center (University of Chicago) revealed that 2% of men and 0.7% of women (yes, that's less than one percent!) report "exclusive homosexual activity in the preceding year."

 

If this survey is accurate, gays and lesbians are confronted with the reality that in 1992 they were accompanied by less than 3% of the population. Where did the other 7% go? Of course, because the survey's assessment was period-specific, and age cohort- unspecific, it is not surprising that these statistics are considerably lower than the Kinsey Report's. Furthermore, the survey's assessment of "exclusive homosexual activity" is limited to gays and lesbians who were sexually active in the past year. The question arises, however: are statlistics limited to respondents who classify themselves as "exclusively heterosexual" best suited to assess the full size of our community? What about those amongst us who shrink away from classifying themselves as "exclusively homosexual" because we don't want to acknowledge what "exclusivity" means in a homophobic society? Or, what of those who are afraid to reveal information about their gayness for a survey... or those who are still closeted, those who suffer in the straight world, fully aware of their secrets, fully aware of the damage that would result from revealing them — victims, in turn, of a paralyzing fear of entering the "unknown" and stigmatized gay world, or of leaving the security of the inadequate but "known" and "normal" straight one. There are, of course, a myriad of other factors which serve to encourage homosexual invisibility, especially of lesbians, in our society. How then are we to best assess ourselves? After all, for anyone who has attended the Castro Street Fair in San Francisco it is hard to believe that those streets alone are not filled by at least 3% of the country!

 

An interview with Tom Smith of the National Opinion Research Center illuminated certain characteristics of the CNN-reported study: 1. The survey sample size: 2243 men, 3017 women. 2. It was a "totally representative, nationwide, random survey of households." Smith was asked about the value of a random nationwide survey given the tendency for gays and lesbians to congregate in urban areas and in particular cities and regions across the country. Smith responded that "only under very extreme conditions where all the group is concentrated in a particular area" do regional oversights have much of an effect. Furthermore, after some additional commentary on the tried and true nature of the "General Social Survey," Smith assured that for the past ten years San Francisco and New York have, in fact, been included in the sample. When asked if there was any significant in the number of gay/lesbian self-reports in those particular areas, Smith responded that no qualified statistician would isolate those statistics since the respondents from those areas represented a "very small" percentage of the total and would therefore not provide a reliable measure. ...What's wrong with this picture?

The significance of this report airing on CNN Headline News is two-fold.

1. The survey designed by the National Opinion Research Center was structured in such a way that gays and (especially) lesbians were rendered more "invisible" than they already are. Any gay or lesbian in this country would find these statistics very hard to believe.
2. The selection of, and report on the nation's #1 news channel of statistics which appear to provide erroneous information on our presence in the population is highly damaging to both gays and non-gays. Certainly we demand to have our rights represented regardless of our numbers, but numbers which aren't accurate take from us the confidence we need to believe we are not alone and the dignity and self-esteem that is necessary for us to consider ourselves worthy of representation. ...And of course, statistics like these make it much easier for those who aren't sympathetic to our lifestyles to argue that we are little more than "a big deal made out of nothing."

All this is not to suggest that we turn today's statisticians back on the past to enforce a reification of the Kinsey 10%. Kinsey's numbers were gathered from intensive and extensive, longitudinal interviews which defined homosexuality in very broad terms. (To Tom Smith's credit, he notes that one of the great gifts of Kinsey's study was its assessment of fluidity in sexual and gender identity.) The results, in fact, may even be seen to overestimate the prevalence of homosexuality in America. However, what I do mean to suggest is that gays and lesbians in America would do themselves a great service by exposing the nature of surveys that claim to assess our number in the population to a severe critique. We should be sure, against all fears, to record the truth about ourselves if we ever find that we are subjects in such surveys and, most of all, we should think of ways in which we can accurately reach one another and develop our own means — our own numbers if necessary — of determining the size and extent of our (wonderful! growing!) community.

 

公平世界

 

 

也许在这个世界上本来就会有许多的不公平，在很多人眼中那些所谓的身份本来就应该低下的人是不需要爱和关怀的。其实一个完整，和谐，美好的社会需要我们去关心那些弱势之人。好不容易现在我作了一次弱势群体---- 

在我的高三暑假中，我去了福州，在福州的半个月里，我决大多数的时间都奔波在医院和我二姨家两点之间。我外婆因为要去医院进行全面的检查，我大多数时间都要在医院里度过，具体地说是在医院的等待厅里度过的，为了一个大约10分钟的检查，甚至是为了咨询医生一些基本的问题和一些具体的事项，经常是在大厅里面等医生叫你的名字大约要1、2个小时。每次晚到了之后还没有医生的预定了，在福州的大医院里，大多的有名的医生都要预定才能向他就症，名医须预定，晚来则无位！是，啊 ，在当今的这个世界中，在这个有生老病死的社会上，有人生病就会有医生的一碗饭吃；在当今这个世界中，有钱人想要永葆青春的有钱人，就会有医生薪水的制造厂。在当今的这个世界上，只要有手术，就会有回扣，只要有药方就会有，就会有回扣。医生们正在用着自己锋利的手术刀，向病人索取自己的行刀费，医生们正用这他们的救世济民专业知识，伸向了病人们的钱包！是啊，在被医院收了钱之后，病人们还会高兴地对医院说：“谢谢啊！”。我很震惊，我很难过，被人涮了还不知道。难到这个世界上就只能这样吗？

        行医易，就医难，

        行医赚，就医烦。

世界正是有了这些弱势的群体才能够体现这些优势群体的伟大啊！！！没有人愿意天生就是弱者，没有人愿意一出生就是别人生命中的配角，是别人伟大，别人高尚的陪衬。但是我却无能无力，这就是一个弱肉强食的世界，是一个能者生存的世界，是一个优胜略汰的世界。人不就是因为这样才成为世界的主宰的。正是人类在用这个亘古不办的真理来统治这整个自然和人类自己创造的社会圈子。

人， 强者，家财万贯的人---- 妙手仁心的人。

人， 弱者，两袖清风的人---- 痛并呻吟的人。